The Ontario Federation of Teaching Parents

OFTP WebAdmin

Independent Schools

“At the time of this writing, it is reported that there are 102,000 children in 725 independent schools in Ontario. Up to another 20,000 children are being home schooled. The number of independent schools has increased from 560 in 1995. In the Ottawa area there are nearly forty independent schools including Christian, Jewish, Special Needs, Montessori, Waldorf and community based schools. It is a wonderful, rich diversity of schools for parents to choose.” – excerpt from OFIS Newsletter.

Independent Schools Read More »

B.C. Investigates Expansion of Cost-Saving Cyberschools

B.C.’s education ministry is reviewing a new type of education that could revolutionize the way students are taught in this province. It’s virtual-schooling, which enables students to attend cyberschools through their computers, working at their own pace, in their own homes. The cost of their education is significantly lower than in regular schools, especially in B.C., where students generally have contact with only student counsellors and those who mark their work. The education ministry gives each B.C. student $3,500 for computer equipment, but said it is impossible to compare over-all per-pupil costs to the approximately $6,000 per year spent on students in regular schools. In B.C., virtual schooling is still considered a pilot project, with its enrolment capped at 2,200. Before that cap is lifted, says deputy education minister Charles Ungerleider, the ministry needs a better understanding of how virtual schools fulfil the many other duties of conventional schools, such as encouraging social and personal development. “So that we aren’t just creating an electronic workbox for kids.” “Clearly, it has a place,” he said of virtual schooling, “but what is the appropriate place and how does it enhance education?” Ungerleider said he has asked ministry staff to prepare a big-picture look at virtual schooling, and hopes to present a discussion paper to the public before the end of this school year. The education critic for the provincial Liberals, expected to win an election that must be held this spring, says there should be many more opportunities for students, especially in rural areas, to learn via computer. Gordon Hogg said there is also an exciting opportunity to market B.C.’s “valuable curriculum” overseas, raising dollars to pay for other opportunities provincially. Although cyberschools are a recent phenomenon, they are in hot demand across Canada for students who want to work at their own pace, haven’t been successful or don’t like the environment at regular schools, live in remote regions or are intrigued by technology, says a report to be released today by the Society for the Advancement of Excellence in Education. Some 5,000 students in Canada are now enrolled in virtual schools that offer a complete education via the Internet, says the report, a copy of which was obtained by The Vancouver Sun. If enrolments continue to grow, e-learning — as it’s called — could fundamentally change the education system. The report says students who attend virtual schools appear to do as well academically as their peers in conventional schools. “Parents and students, teachers and administrators are very satisfied with and enthusiastic about virtual schools. “Where permitted, enrolments will continue to rise because distributed learning enhances student choices and learning opportunities.” Kathryn Barker, the author of the latest study, found some interesting differences between students who learned on-line and those who attended traditional schools, but said it is premature to draw conclusions. Students attending cyberschools generally showed: Less improvement in listening, speaking. Greater improvement in critical thinking, researching and using computers. Increased abilities in problem solving, creative thinking, decision-making and time management. Since few students have completed Grade 12 through virtual schooling, it is too early to reach conclusions about overall achievement. But based on the limited data available, it appears cyberstudents perform as well as regular students over-all, the study says. Sarah Ward, 17, is one of 300 students in the Vancouver area who is on the cutting edge in this educational experiment. After finishing Grade 7, she dropped out of the traditional public school system, not because of poor grades but because she didn’t like the reputation of her designated secondary school. Besides, she thought she might do just as well — or better — through correspondence. Four years ago, she was offered a chance to go to a virtual school and now says she can’t imagine ever returning to a regular school. As a student at the Greater Vancouver Distance Education School, she takes all of her courses on-line, attends virtual classes for group discussions and hangs out in the school’s virtual cafe. “At first, I liked the idea of sleeping in, but now I feel I’ve developed much more as an individual than I would have [in regular school]. I feel liberated,” she said. She said she spends about the same amount of time learning as she would in a regular school, but it’s all self-directed. “It’s been difficult, you have to be self-motivated. You don’t have teachers barking at you.” Ken Harvey, her principal, said there are 18 virtual schools in B.C., all learning from one another. “We don’t see this as a pilot [project], but as another opportunity for our students…” He said he hasn’t been overwhelmed by demand, but that may be because information about the program is mainly spread by word of mouth. His enrolment of 300 is actually 100 above the cap set by the ministry. Barker said e-learning is a contentious issue because teacher unions tend not to be supportive. Representatives of the B.C. Teachers’ Federation were not available for comment, but Barker said the Canadian federation opposes virtual schooling.

B.C. Investigates Expansion of Cost-Saving Cyberschools Read More »

Study – Homeschooled Students Excel

Paula Rothermel, of the School of Education, University of Durham, U.K., has conducted several research studies on home educated children. An article titled “A nationwide study of home education: early indications and wider implications” was published in the Summer 1999 issue of Education Now. Findings in brief This three year study of home education in the U.K. involved 1000 families. Several hundred children participated in this first national assessment of children educated, by choice, outside the school system. The assessments measured psychological stability, academic attainment, and social skills. One main area of the research consisted of 135 interviews conducted with home educating families, in their own homes. Parental background Trained school teachers made up almost 1/4 of the parents. The consensus was that teacher training equipped parents to better communicate with their local education authority. However, more parents were involved in manual and semi-skilled occupations than professional. The children whose parents were classified as from the lower end of the social scale fared substantially better. Motivation to home educate Over half of the reasons given for home educating related to being unhappy with school (class sizes, bullying,…). Almost one-third of motivations listed were child-centred (meeting their needs,…). One in five parents described their motivation in terms of their philosophy (ideology, lifestyle, faith,…). Reading The home-educated children demonstrated a high standard of literacy when contrasted with national attainment levels. Throughout the research it was observed that parents were often unable to predict their child’s abilities. More home educated children fell within the early and late reading brackets than the norm. Those children identified as non-reading 7 to 11 year-olds tended to be literary minded, enjoying literature despite their not exhibiting a need to read to themselves. Overview Tentative results suggest that the children assessed, demonstrated high levels of ability and good social skills. They appear to benefit from a curriculum tailored to their individual needs and from the attention given to them by their families. Love and security within the family, regardless of whether the family had one parent, two parents of the same-sex, or two opposite sex parents, positively contributed to the children’s ability to learn, as did the absence of academic and peer pressures often associated with schooling. The opportunity to learn through talk was also contributory. The overall implication is that children may benefit from the self motivation that stems from greater parental participation in their learning process, a more flexible curriculum and an individualised educational programme that reflects their own interests. A growing trend In 1997 it was suggested there may be as many as 50,000 children receiving a home-based education throughout the UK. Rothermel conjectured, in this 1999 research report, that 50,000 may be a conservative estimate. The evidence seems to suggest that the numbers are increasing, a possible indication that growing numbers of parents are uneasy with the mainstream system as it was in 1999 (and presumably still is) in the UK. The way ahead: a third way? What has come to light during the research is that many parents home educated because they perceive it as the only accessible alternative to school. Often the decision appeared to be a compromise. The optimum, it appeared, would be for the third alternative, the ‘third way in education’, whereby each child could adopt a flexible curriculum suited to his or her individual needs, in-school, out of school or flexitime by choice. [s2If current_user_can(access_s2member_level1)] For OFTP members who are logged in, we’ve included the full article below, in case the link to the article became invalid at some point (which it did). The article has been on the OFTP website for a long time but without any indication that permission was granted to reprint it, which is why it is now viewable only by logged-in OFTP members. A nationwide study of home education: early indications and wider implications This three year study of home education involves 1000 families, with a particular focus on the under us. It will be published in full early in the year 2000. Several hundred children participated in this first national assessment programme of children educated, electively, outside the school system. These assessments measured psychological stability, academic attainment and social skills. One main area of the research, however, consisted of 135 interviews conducted with home educating families, in their own homes. Here are some of the results of the study to date. Parental background Home education is often associated with ‘middle class professionals’. This study, however, found quite the reverse to be the case. Based upon an initial analysis, it was found that more parents were involved in manual and semi-skilled occupations than professional. More extraordinary, was the finding that the children whose parents have been classified as from the lower end of the social scale fared substantially better. Previous research supports the idea that parental social class does effect educational outcomes, but the suggestion that children from lower social classes can outperform their higher social class peers is quite possibly, unique. Perhaps the professional parents are more secure with their child’s development and, therefore, may take a more relaxed view of their child’s abilities at this early age. Conversely, parents of the lower end of the social scale may be more conscious of the decision to home educate, thus placing more emphasis on their child’s early abilities. Further analysis will show whether this effect applies to the older children also. Trained school teachers made up almost 1/4 of the parents. It was mostly the mother who was trained to teach and many had, if they had taught at all, done so for a short time. Despite the abundance of teacher parents it was notable that two out of three parents had received no teacher training. In many cases, teacher-parents said that teacher training made them realise that parents could teach. While some teacher-parents found their teaching experience a hindrance, others found it an asset. The consensus was that teacher training equipped parents to better communicate with their local education authority. Interestingly, two-thirds of the parents questioned found their own schooling to have

Study – Homeschooled Students Excel Read More »

Math in a Spider Web?

Math, (Yikes!)… For some of us, this simple word sends a shiver up our spine as those long ago tormented years in math classes come back in a wave of consciousness so strong we can still smell the musty text books and #2 pencils. As parents we desire to help our children learn and understand how they will one day come to use math in their everyday lives. How, then, do we get past our nightmarish math memories to the point where, while educating our children, we too can overcome the hesitations and learn to enjoy math? Have you ever thought of math as beautiful, imaginative or alive? Most only think of math as numbers to be added, subtracted, multiplied and divided. Wherein we may teach children how to manipulate numbers, like when balancing a checkbook, parents seldom show their children how mathematics occurs in nature or in architecture. Perhaps this is because they were never shown these simple, everyday connections. Theoni Pappas, author of Fractals, Googols and Other Mathematical Tales, delivers a unique approach to math in that she emphasizes the beauty and hidden wonders of mathematics. Instead of focusing solely on numbers, she attempts to open eyes to the incredible mathematical patterns that appear naturally in the world. She probes deeply into observations of things like spider webs, sunflowers, leaf patterns and coastlines. Most importantly, Ms. Pappas takes readers into a world where math is not only beautiful but also awe-inspiring and fun. Homeschool.com consulted with Theoni Pappas. We asked her for advice on how parents can overcome their own math phobias in order to help their children discover the joy of mathematics. Her suggestions were simple and constructive. 1. Don’t let your fear of math come across to your kids. Parents must be careful not to perpetuate the mathematical myth – that math is only for specially talented math types. Strive not to make comments like; they don’t like math or I have never been good at math. When children overhear comments like these from their primary role models they begin to dread math before even considering a chance of experiencing its wonders. It is important to encourage your children to read and explore the rich world of mathematics, and to practice mathematics without imparting negative biases. 2. Don’’t immediately associate math with computation (counting). It is very important to realize that math is not just numbers and computations, but a realm of exciting ideas that touch every part of our lives: from making a telephone call to how the hair grows on someone’s head. Take your children outside and point out real objects that display math concepts. For example, show them the symmetry of a leaf or angles on a building. Take a close look at the spirals in a spider web or intricate patterns of a snowflake. 3. Help your child understand why math is important. Math improves problem solving, increases competency and should be applied in different ways. It’s the same as reading. You can learn the basics of reading without ever enjoying a novel. But, where’s the excitement in that? With math, you could stop with the basics. But why when there is so much more to be gained by a fuller understanding? Life is so much more enriching when we go beyond the basics. Stretch your children’s minds to become involved in mathematics in ways that will not only be practical but also enhance their lives. 4. Make math as hands on as possible. Mathematicians participate in mathematics. To really experience math encourage your child to dig in and tackle problems in creative ways. Help them learn how to manipulate numbers using concrete references they understand as well as things they can see or touch. Look for patterns everywhere, explore shapes and symmetries. How many octagons do you see each day on the way to the grocery store? Play math puzzles and games and then encourage your child to try to invent their own. And, whenever possible, help your child realize a mathematical conclusion with real and tangible results. For example, measure out a full glass of juice with a measuring cup and then ask your child to drink half. Measure what is left. Does it measure half of a cup? 5. Read books that make math exciting. Fractals, Googols and Other Mathematical Tales introduces an animated cat who explains fractals, tangrams and other mathematical concepts you’ve probably never heard of, to children in terms they can understand. This book can double as a great text book by using one story per lesson. A Wrinkle in Time is a well-loved classic, combining fantasy and science. The Joy of Mathematics helps adults explore the beauty of mathematics that is all around. The Math Curse is an amusing book for 4-8 year olds. The Gnarly Gnews is a free, humorous bi-monthly newsletter on mathematics. The Phantom Tollbooth is an Alice-in-Wonderland-style adventure into the worlds of words and numbers. 6. Use the internet to help your child explore the fascinating world of mathematics. Web Math (www.webmath.com) provides a powerful set of math-solvers that gives you instant answers to the stickiest problems. Math League (www.mathleague.com) has challenging math materials and contests for fourth grade and above. Math Prose ([web editor’s note: link removed – no longer available]) introduces short, educational math stories. The Gallery of Interactive Geometry (www.geom.uiuc.edu/apps/gallery.html) is full of fascinating, interactive geometry activities.

Math in a Spider Web? Read More »

Extended School Health Services for Homeschoolers – report of problems

In the August 2000 issue of Home Rules, it was reported by Albert Lubberts, President of OFTP, that School Health Support Services would be extended to all independent schools as well as home educated school aged children in the province. This new initiative came into effect on September 2000. The services covered are: occupational therapy, speech-language pathology, nursing, physiotherapy and dietetic services. Unfortunately, several OFTP members have tried to access this service and have run into road blocks with this new arrangement several in connection with speech therapy. Albert Lubberts has stated that the government has been slow in informing (educating) its officials about the new policy. Please note that a home educated child does not have to be registered with a school board in order to access these services which is what homeschooling parents are being told when they contact the Access Centres. Many of the Access Centres know nothing about this new arrangement. In order to cut through the lethargy on this issue and get your children the services they need, OFTP suggests that you write to the address below provided by Albert Lubberts: Web Editor’s Note: contact information removed Explain your particular situation and refer them to the page on our website, indicated above, for specific details. OFTP would like to receive feedback on your dealings with Ms. […] and any success you may have had at obtaining services for your child at one of the Access Centres.

Extended School Health Services for Homeschoolers – report of problems Read More »

TV or Not TV? That Is the Question

Recently there was a discussion regarding TV on the homeschool-ca list [Web Editor’s Note: probably actually the hs-ca list — the homeschool-ca list is now used for administration of the www.flora.org/homeschool-ca website]. The question of whether children should watch TV or not was posted to the OFTP email list as well. Here are some responses: We’ve never had a TV. I have only one child (now an older teenager), but I “do” remember times when it would have seemed like heaven to be able to engage her with something that would keep her out of my hair. However, over the years, we worked out ways to negotiate time apart and time together. She got very good at finding ways to amuse herself, and the ways she found tended to particularly reveal who she was and what she was most interested in. I think we probably spent lots more time together than we would have if we’d had a TV around. I found lots of ways to include her in things that would have been easier to do by myself—but she’s turned out to be a most capable young woman, and a wonderful companion. If you have the option to be TV-less, I say go for it! (P.S. My 18-year-old daughter, who grew up without TV, is going off to study documentary film making next year!). Stephanie Judy We DO have a TV. We get a million channels. It’s a small-dish system that we got about a year and a half ago (we get no local reception to speak of, have no cable option). My husband wanted it. He likes his TV. But I thought about the temptingly easy child-control that Margaret was speaking about needing. I think I used this a little when we first got our satellite dish, but I haven’t turned the TV on for the kids more than three or four times in the past year. My kids are 5, almost three and a baby. I spend a heck of a lot of time at home alone with them, but I don’t use the TV. My husband wonders how I do it. Whenever he’s here as primary parent they ask and ask and ask and they get obnoxious with each other and they complain about being bored and they ask again if they can watch a little TV. And when he turns it on they turn into docile manageable little things, sitting on the couch like bumps on a log. When I come home, they say “oh oh, here’s mom!” and they watch as I turn the thing off and they run off and find something to do together with markers or books or matchbox cars or bikes and sticks. If they get obnoxious with each other, I might suggest a new activity, or try to engage one of the perpetrators in helping me in some small way with a task. But I have got out of the habit of thinking, “oh, it would be so nice to turn on the TV and have them sit quietly,” and they know there is no point in asking me. Anyway, because I’m out of the habit of thinking of TV as a tempting option, it is no hardship for me to be a parent without TV. We have two approaches to TV represented here in our house, and the kids are very adept at knowing which regime they exist under at any given moment. I think mine is easier in the long run, and certainly better for the kids. My husband is home alone with them so rarely that I’m happy to let him play the game his way when he’s in charge: they watch educational stuff, so I’m not too concerned about content. But they know he’s a pushover, and so they tend to ask and whine and mis-behave in order to get their TV time. With me they don’t even think about bothering. It gets really easy to do without the TV after a while. I think it maybe takes a month or so to get used to it. Miranda Hughes (mini-dished in New Denver, BC) I let my kids watch whatever kid-safe TV they want. I let them watch as often and as long as they want, and I even suggest programs and arrange dinner around certain TV shows. I never monitor them; kid TV is too boring for me to tolerate. Guess what? They rarely watch TV. They’re too darned busy and unless I pipe up with “Guess what kids? There’s a Big Cats documentary on tonight” they’d miss it. In the winter they watch more TV than in the summer, when it’s practically non-existent unless friends are over. I am fortunate, I suppose, that TV viewing has never been an issue in my house. As they get older I am curious about whether my extremely slack ‘unschooling’ approach to TV-monitoring stands the test of time. I certainly hope so, because the benefits they can receive from the absolutely phenomenal programming on TV today are not something that I’d want to limit. When my 5-year-old daughter mentioned to my Dad in casual conversation the name of a female astronaut that was currently in space I feel that we’re doing okay, and I can’t wait until their interests expand even more and they can take a more active role in their own TV show choices. Mary Pearson Burke We own a TV but we limit watching it to about an hour a day (some days we don’t watch any, some days we watch more especially if the weather is lousy or we aren’t well!!) When I speak about “we” it really doesn’t include me – I rarely watch TV, normally only if we rent a movie but when the kids want to watch something I like to make it a time to learn and it is always an opportunity for cuddle time or family time! We do watch some of the nature shows like weather

TV or Not TV? That Is the Question Read More »

U.S. Government Honours Home Education

On Tuesday, September 26, 2000 the U.S. House passed a homeschool resolution honoring home education. House Resolution 578, sponsored by Bob Schaffer from Colorado, had positive, bipartisan support. No votes were recorded, as it passed by voice vote. Congressman Goodling, Chairman of the Education and Workforce Committee spoke in favor of the measure. Indeed, all speeches were praising the accomplishments of homeschooling families and they repeatedly acknowledged the primary role which all parents have in educating their children. HOUSE RESOLUTION 578 Congratulating home educators and home schooled students across the Nation for their ongoing contributions to education and for the role they play in promoting and ensuring a brighter, stronger future for this Nation, and for other purposes. Whereas the United States is committed to excellence in education and to strengthening the family; Whereas parental choice and involvement are important to excellence in education; Whereas parents have a fundamental right to direct the education and upbringing of their children; Whereas home schooling families contribute significantly to cultural diversity, which is important to a healthy society; Whereas home education allows families the opportunity to provide their children a sound academic education integrated with high ethical standards taught within a safe and secure environment; Whereas home education has been a major part of American education and culture since the Nation’s inception and demonstrates the American ideals of innovation, entrepreneurship, and individual responsibility; Whereas home education was proven successful in the lives of George Washington, Patrick Henry, John Quincy Adams, John Marshall, Robert E. Lee, Booker T. Washington, Thomas Edison, Abraham Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Mark Twain, John Singleton Copley, William Carey, Phyllis Wheatley, and Andrew Carnegie, who were each home schooled; Whereas today the United States has a significant number of parents who teach a total of approximately 1,700,000 home schooled students, thus saving several billion dollars on public education each year; Whereas home schooled students exhibit self-confidence and good citizenship and are fully prepared academically and socially to meet the challenges of today’s society; Whereas scores of contemporary studies, including a 1999 University of Maryland analysis of the nationally recognized Iowa Test of Basic Skills, confirm that children who are educated at home perform exceptionally well on nationally normed achievement tests, and such performance is also demonstrated by the fact that home schooled students scored well above the national average on the 2000 SAT and the 1997, 1998, 1999, and 2000 ACT; Whereas studies demonstrate that home schooled students excel in college, with the grade point average of home schooled students exceeding the college average; Whereas home schooled students continue to exhibit excellence in academic competitions, as demonstrated by home schooled students finishing first, second, and third in the 2000 Scripps-Howard National Spelling Bee and by a home schooled student finishing second in the 2000 National Geography Bee sponsored by the National Geographic Society; and Whereas National Home Education Week, beginning on October 1, 2000, and ending on October 7, 2000, furthers the goal of honoring home educators and home schooled students for their efforts to improve the quality of education in the United States: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That the House of Representatives – (1) congratulates home educators and home schooled students across the Nation for their ongoing contributions to education and for the role they play in promoting and ensuring a brighter, stronger future for the Nation; (2) honors home educators and home schooled students for their efforts to improve the quality of education in the United States; and (3) supports the goals of National Home Education Week.

U.S. Government Honours Home Education Read More »

Extended School Health Services for Homeschoolers

On December 16, 1999 Elizabeth Witmer, the Minister of Health & Long Term Care (MOHLTC) announced the government’s commitment to provide School Health Support Services to all independent school and home educated school aged children in the province. This new initiative will come into effect in September, 2000. The expected cost to start up this program is between 3 & 4 million dollars. These services would be identical to those the public school children already receive since 1984. All costs will be covered by the MOHLTC through the local Community Care Access Centres (CCAC). For all you history buffs, you may recall that the health services issue has long been a contention between independent educators and the government. It was part of the independent school funding issue that went to the Supreme Court a few years ago. That is known as the Adler case. The independent schools (OFTP was a party to this case) lost in their bid under the Charter of Rights & Freedoms. The Supreme Court ruled that the issue should be settled politically as there was no legal format for the court to force the Ontario government to fund independent education. Further pressure was brought on the government when the United Nations considered the issue and decided that there were discriminatory actions by the provincial government. To placate the independent education sector, Premier Harris decided the time was politically correct to extend the health services to the independent and home schooled children. Since early January, the Ontario Federation of Teaching Parents has been engaged in a series of implementation meetings with the various stake holders and the Ministry of Health. There are still a good number of details to iron out including the final wording of the regulation that will be put into effect this summer. However, our last meeting on June 20, 2000 allows OFTP to make the information available to our members. It is estimated that about four percent of home schooled children will be able to benefit from this extended service. As well, it is understood that some of your children who can benefit from this service are already doing so. That is good. What is covered in this extended School Health Support Service? Occupational Therapy, Speech-Language Pathology, Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Dietetic Services. How do you access this service? Educators, school principals and parents can refer a child to the local Community Care Access Centre for an assessment. When you believe or have reason to believe that your child may qualify for any of these services, contact your local Community Care Access Centre. Set up an appointment with a case worker there before September 1, 2000 if possible. Identify yourself as a parent whose child is in an independent school or is taught at home and that your school aged child may qualify for the school health support service. If the case worker does not consider your child to be eligible, ask for a referral to a professional or other agency who may be able to help. Do not be shy. What are Community Care Access Centres? In 1996, 43 Community Care Access Centres were created to consolidate health care services provided by 38 home care programs and 36 placement services. They are responsible, in part, for determining eligibility for, and buying on behalf of consumers the highest quality best priced visiting professional and homemaker services provided at home and in publicly funded schools as well as service planning and case management for each client. It must be remembered, however, that regardless of the amount of money willing to be spent, it is the availability of the right professional people that will determine the success of the programs offered. Unfortunately there is a great shortage of professionals in the fields of the services extended. Who pays for this service? The government is willing to commit whatever dollars are required to make this service work for you. All costs will be paid for by the Ministry of Health through the local Community Care Access Centre. You will receive no invoice for the service whether your child qualifies or not. Where do I get further information? A list of all Community Care Access Centres [was] included below [in the original article]. The local CCAC can provide you with a list of the services offered or refer you to someone who does. If problems are encountered please contact your local OFTP contact. The Ontario Community Care Access Centre website is [no longer a valid URL]. Ontario Community Care Access Centres (CCAC‘s) [The article included a list of all the CCACs. The provision of these services has since been restructured and CCACs no longer exist.]

Extended School Health Services for Homeschoolers Read More »

Homeschooling and Citizenship

A summary of the research report “Homeschooling and the Redefinition of Citizenship” by Bruce Arai. Bruce Arai teaches courses in research methods, statistics, and the sociology of work at Wilfrid Laurier University. His research interests include homeschooling, educational assessment, and economic sociology, particularly self-employment. Professor Arai is also the author of a study entitled “Changes in Parents’: Motivations for Homeschooling” which was featured in the October 1999 issue of Home Rules. He has been researching the topic of homeschooling for three years, and is currently in the process of gathering data on attitudes towards homeschoolers. He and his wife, Tracey Appleton, homeschool their three children, aged 4, 6 and 8. A great deal of research on homeschooling has focused on comparisons between homeschooled and schooled children with respects to academics and why people choose to homeschool their children. In his research paper entitled “Homeschooling and the Redefinition of Citizenship,” Professor Arai focuses on the area of citizenship — can people be good citizens without going to school? His paper shows that homeschoolers have a different but equally valid understanding of citizenship. Most of the concerns/objections surrounding homeschooling revolve around whether or not homeschooled children are being properly socialized in order to develop into good citizens. What is meant by “proper socialization” can be broken down into several components: 1) homeschooled children will not be able to cope in and with the harsh realities of the real world; 2) parents will provide a biased and narrow curricular content for their homeschooled children — schooled children are exposed to many different teachers with various areas of expertise; 3) homeschooled children do not receive enough exposure to others and this will produce people with higher levels of prejudice and intolerance. Parents who homeschool their children are also accused of elitism. They are removing their children from the public school system because it is in a shambles when they should be staying and fighting to improve the system. It is also believed that home schooling can only be done by parents with higher levels of education. Only the elites have the ability to educate their children at home. Another concern deals with post-secondary education. Many believe that if children do not go through the traditional school system and receive a high school diploma then they will not have the proper credentials to attend college and university. This concern is perhaps the only one that is shared both by the critics and homeschoolers themselves. Coping in the real world, getting along with others, working for the common good and contributing to society through higher education becomes part of what is considered a good citizen. Can homeschoolers fit properly into the larger society? Eamonn Callan feels that there should be no parental choice in education. He believes that all children should attend a common school to receive a common curriculum in order to ensure a “vibrant sense of citizenship among present and future generations.” Callan believes that a common school can provide: a) critical tolerance of diversity; b) the power of rational thought and argument and c) a commitment to a moral code. (Editor’s Note: Eammon Callan used to be Dean of Education at the University of Alberta and is currently the Mactaggart Fellow in the Department of Educational Foundations at this university. He has written several very respected books on education, and educational philosophy. He is basically an advocate of “Common schooling” by which he means all kids attending the same school, with a common curriculum, underpinned by a rather liberal, but firmly held moral code. He has written two books on education entitled, “Creating Citizens: Political Education & Liberal Democracy” and “Autonomy & Schooling.”) Callan refers to his vision as ‘schooling as the great sphere.’  “This is a form of schooling in which children are helped to explore the world and in the process they acquire the abilities to decide for themselves how and where they wish to live in that world.” Callan argues that parents should only be allowed to keep their children out of school in clearly defined circumstances and “exemptions should only be granted after careful scrutiny of each case.” He does not believe that parents should have the right to reject this great sphere schooling for their children since it “would interfere with the child’s future ‘zone of personal sovereignty’ by keeping the child ‘ethically servile’ to her or his parents. ” Children removed from the great sphere schooling could be brainwashed into accepting their parents limited view of the world which would be harmful for the child and the larger society. So…if the purpose of school is to create good citizens, then what type of citizenship education should children be receiving in school? Many models have been presented and debated, however, no one has presented a single vision of citizenship which has been acceptable to everyone. Over the years more emphasis has been placed on teaching facts about a country’s political system stressing rights and responsibilities. Less emphasis has been placed on participation and connection in the community. Schools are now beginning to rediscover that participation in the community is important for the education of proper citizens. Today, many students may believe that participation in the community is important, however, very few actually participate in these activities. Therefore, do homeschoolers make good citizens? Do homeschoolers pose a threat to citizenship since they do not attend school? Professor Arai believes that “yes” homeschoolers do make good citizens. However, there are differences between the vision of citizenship presented in schools and what is found among homeschoolers. Homeschoolers have responded to the above criticisms by creating a different kind of citizenship through their actions. They do not accept the assumption that school is the only place that one can go to become a good citizen. Most homeschoolers do not want to isolate themselves from the larger society and, therefore, seek “meaningful integration” into society which produces a different but equally valid understanding of citizenship. Homeschoolers believe that school is not the

Homeschooling and Citizenship Read More »

How Do I Maintain My Child’s Interest?

When can the kids quit? I think one of the more difficult questions in homeschooling is deciding when to let the kids quit something they don’t like and when to insist that they persevere. A few points to consider, when weighing the pros and cons: There are infinite numbers of different ways to learn and some methods and resources suit some kids a whole lot better than others. There’s no reason, for example, to force a specific history curriculum if your kids loathe it when there are so many alternative resources and approaches available. Learning is practically nil when students lack liking or interest. If a kid absolutely hates Resource X and is miserable at the sight of it, Resource X — no matter how much it costs and how much everybody else’s kids like it — isn’t providing an optimum learning environment for yours. Look at the way kids sop information up when they’re curious and fascinated vs. their snail-like progress when they’re not. One of the great benefits of homeschooling is our ability to provide fuel for their curiosity. This shouldn’t be a battle over parental respect.  Certainly we all want our kids to respect (and love and admire) us, but learning shouldn’t be something they do solely to please US — learning is what they do to please, delight, and surprise themselves. Homeschooling on our part, as parents, is a process of discovery, a constant experiment in helping our kids find their personal best way to learn. Anyway, nobody should panic themselves into thinking that “I hate my math program” means “I hate you.” In most cases, it means “Help!” And kids do learn beautifully.  It’s impossible to prevent them from learning. That learning, however, doesn’t necessarily take place as (or when) we expect it to. Some kids respond enthusiastically to structure and workbooks; some don’t. Some despise history — unless it’s taught through music or science or art. Sometimes learning is messy – there you are, intent on teaching the geography of Antarctica, and they’re hopping around begging to read “Mr. Popper’s Penguins.” Homeschoolers are flexible enough to drop the map and read “Mr. Popper’s Penguins.” Strike when the iron is hot. On the other hand…..Some skills and academic concepts are only acquired through hard and often tedious work — piano practice and the multiplication tables spring to mind. No way around this. But there are long-term rewards and huge payoffs in expertise. On the other hand…..All three of our kids started taking violin lessons when they were very young. Two of them stuck with it, are now excellent players, and are still taking violin lessons. One of them, after a year or so of lessons, announced that he didn’t like it. He didn’t practice. We nagged. We made inspiring speeches about the rewards of hard work. We tried creative bribery. He still didn’t practice; he dragged his feet enroute to lessons. This went on for months. Finally, after much soul-searching, we let him quit. At this point, he never wanted to take music lessons again. SIX YEARS LATER……He decided that he would like to take piano lessons. He threw himself into it; is having fun and doing great. Then, persuaded by his brothers — who pitched strings — he decided to learn the string bass. Which he is. Sometimes I think we should never have let him quit the violin. Sometimes I think we should have let him quit sooner. Rebecca Rupp, Ph.D., has homeschooled her three sons for more than ten years and has been a leading proponent of the burgeoning homeschooling movement. She is the author of many books and articles on education and natural history, including How We Remember and Why We Forget (Three Rivers Press, 1998). She lives in Shaftsbury, Vermont. Rupp has recently written two new books: The Complete Home Learning Sourcebook (Crown, 1998) and Getting Started on Home Learning: How and Why To Teach Your Kids at Home (Crown, 1999) The above article was obtained, with permission, from the “Homeschool Zone”. This [was] an online virtual community of homeschoolers, afterschoolers, parents, and educators with special sections for moms, dads, kids and more. Free e-newsletters; global & local support; ADD/ADHD support; free crafts.  

How Do I Maintain My Child’s Interest? Read More »